Judging from the chyrons on MSNBC, they aren't very careful about getting the details of the news right. It's difficult to watch for even an hour without seeing something spelled incorrectly. I wouldn't watch, but Blondie loves MSNBC, and if I want to sit with her, I put up with what she has on the tube.
I think it may have been on Rachel Maddow's Tuesday night show where a guest displayed a picture of west Manhattan, which looked positively rural. The guest said the picture was old - it was from 1980. Uh, I don't think so. Maybe 1880. Anyone can misstate themselves, of course, but shouldn't someone at MSNBC be watching the show and pass a note in class telling the host or the guest telling them they made what appears to be a slip of the tongue?
Tonight, though, there was a full-screen graphic, a promotion for one of their shows, where they ask whether someone will need to "tow the line." That would be toe the line. That is, you are required to remain behind a line, and not cross it, even to the extent of one toe. If a fishing boat, on the other hand, has a mooring line fall overboard, and the rope drags behind the boat, being pulled by one end, the boat is towing the line.
By a curious coincidence, I was reading a post this evening and the blogger made reference to her brother. "As a toe-headed child and on into his brown haired, six foot four inch years, my brother loved mashed potatoes." I hate to ask if that's what she really meant, because if you have a toe for a head, that's far more interesting that someone who eats mashed potatoes with gusto. It sounds like she meant tow-headed, that dark blonde color that develops in the preschool years when brunettes start out blonde at birth.
And it's really not fair to be overly-critical, for she spent the last few years in Europe, and it's the kind of mistake anyone could make when they are not fully alert. I wouldn't be reading her blog but for the fact that at least 50% of the time, it's quite interesting. I usually keep a blog on my RSS reader if they can produce even one interesting post in ten.
As a former newspaper editor, I've spent many hours correcting the writing of others. Regular readers will observe that I soaked up a lot of their errors, which now leak out my fingers as I write blog posts.
On one of the bulletin boards I frequent, there was a grammar flame. Spelling flames are considered pretty lame, and if anything, grammar flames are even lamer. However, one user did a grammar flame, and the response was a rebuttal, along with a challenge, asserting that the flamer wouldn't be able to get a real grammarian to agree. Well, there aren't many people who are real grammarians; editors come fairly close, so I posted a discussion of the various points, and whether they were valid or not.
I put my protective clothing on before I returned to the BBS, but instead of the many people attacking me that I expected, I found a number of people thanking me for an interesting and informative post. Wow. And one commented that the word "quibble" was a funny word. I'd used it a lot, because neither the flamer nor the flamee were entirely correct about most of the points.
Someone who quibbles is a pettifogger. A quibble is a disagreement based on something minor, something that's usually not particularly significant. You can also cavil, or you can brabble, which are also disagreements about something that doesn't matter, but those who brabble are chiding, and those who cavil really have their backs up. A quibble, especially when you admit it's a quibble, is actually an agreement of sorts. It's nice, friendly, yep you're right, although there's just this one minor point where we disagree. I prefer to be nice and friendly, although some days, I get so frustrated that I feel like I should thump the next idiot over the head, as a civic duty to improve the gene pool.
When I was young, Dad would hassle us kids - we were always doing something important, like reading a book for pleasure - and insist that we redd up the table. I never heard anyone else use that phrase, to redd up, and I wondered if he was misusing the word "raid". In my 20s, though, I stumbled across the word in the dictionary. I'd looked in many dictionaries, over the years, to see if it accepted by any lexicographer, as a definition of the word "red". Without that double "d" on the end, I missed it entirely. I had never said a word to Dad about it, and to apologize openly at this point wouldn't be kind, but I said a prayer for him, from hundreds of miles away, that he get more respect and less hassle from those not as learned as he.
Dad was forced to quit school in the middle of his freshman year of high school to help farm. He always felt inferior because of that, but his lack of schooling had never stopped him from learning. He'd watched tradesmen do things, and he'd asked questions, and he'd tried to do things over and over until he got them right, and ended up a quite capable handyman. He was a farmer most of the time, but insurance agents hired him to repair damage to customers' homes. The agents knew that he'd do the work right the first time, that his quiet and gentle manner would be pleasing to the customers, many of whom were retired ladies, and that the customers would be impressed with the fact that Dad always cleaned up the area when he was done working.
At one point, the town dentist decided to relocate, and the school board was short a member. One board member asked him to fill that seat, at least until the next election. He pointed out his lack of a high school diploma, and that board member told him it didn't matter, that was was really needed was common sense. He served on the board, and when election time came, he got more votes than anyone else running.
When he first joined the board, they had to elect a board president. One of the board members was a hothead, a former maintenence man who'd been fired. The story was that he got caught stealing; he insisted he was fired unfairly. He originally wanted to get elected, so he could fire the superintendent who'd fired him, but he got cheated of that, because the superintendent took a job with another district at a big pay increase. Every year, though, he wanted to be elected school board president, and the other board members chose someone else.
Dad nominated the hothead to be president of the school board. I thought the result would be disaster, but really, all the board president does is sit at the end of the table; every else's votes counted just as much, and individual board members were powerless, as only the board acting as the board could do anything. Having gotten the respect he thought he'd been denied years before, the hothead was finally satisfied, and he decided not to run for election again. Being on the school board is actually a big pain. Once again, Dad was incredibly smart, making a decision I'd never have chosen.
With five on the board, that meant that three members could run things if they acted in concert. During his second term on the board, his first full term, it became increasingly obvious that three of the board members were meeting ahead of time, deciding what they would do, thus making the actual board meetings moot. What's more, their discussions were held in private, and the public didn't know the reasons they were doing what they were.
Perhaps they were acting with the best interests of the school at heart. The fact that they were acting in stealth mode, however, suggests otherwise. What's more, Dad wasn't too fond of the moral character of those three. Oh, it was nothing like having an affair. It was the fact that these three board members were repeatedly caught in lies, and were known, on occasion, to treat customers in a manner other than what Dad thought was right. He didn't know what was going on - but he wanted shed of it. He was eager for his term on the school board to end, so he could be an ordinary citizen again.
It's generally accepted that most people cheat on their taxes. Most of them are minor cheats. If you win $20 in a raffle at the fair, you're supposed to report that as income; few people do. Dad, however, cheated on his taxes in favor of the IRS. For instance, he had a station wagon that was used 70% of the time for farming, buying parts for farm equipment, or seed, or fertilizer, etc., and about 20% of the time for doing insurance repair work. About 10% of the time, it was used for personal purposes. For instance, if he had gotten dirty, and needed to make a quick trip to town, he'd take the station wagon in order to keep the sedan clean.
Since he sometimes used the sedan to fetch parts, paint, nails, etc., that business use pretty much equalled the personal use of the station wagon. It would have been reasonable to claim 100% of the use of the station wagon as business expense, and that's what most people would do. Others would go to the hassle of claiming 90% of the use of the station wagon, and 10% of the use of the sedan. Dad, however, insisted on deducting only half the use of the station wagon, and none of the use of the sedan, because he wanted to be fair to the government.
Last year, Joe Biden said it was patriotic to pay your taxes, and the GOP candidates at every level made fun of him for saying that. All I could think, though, was that Joe Biden would have loved to have known my father. And I keep working on it, hoping that someday, I'll manage to be half the man my father was.
Other Bloggers On Related Topics:
chyron - income tax - Joe Biden - MSNBC - pettifogger - quibble - Rachel Maddow - redd up - school board - toe the line - tow-headed
Comments
Good Writing, Good Thinking
Bob writes, via the site feedback form:
I don't find many blogs to be worth reading. I myself am a good writer and a good thinker, but with a 14 year old daughter, a consuming computer career, a needy wife (no trophy wife for me, yet, or probably ever) I can't blog myself. I just have too much to do. I'm jealous.
But it is very refreshing to find someone who is insightful, deeply thoughtful, and has the ability to communicate what they think in a fresh and involving fashion. What's more shocking is that you appear to be a conservative, while I'm a liberal, and yet I find myself agreeing with everything you say. I wish more conservatives and liberals both would read your words, and start to find the common ground that is "reason."
Thanks for the kind words.
Thanks for the kind words. Where do I send the check?
As blogs go, this one is a disaster. It wanders all over the place. If you want to get a lot of traffic, you're supposed to stick to one topic per post, so that Google can figure out what the page is about, and preferably one topic per blog, so that Google will rank you higher.
The Republicans want to tar and feather me, and ride me out of town on a rail. As Mark Twain commented, if not for the honor of the thing, I'd druther walk. And with the exception of Mr. Obama, I don't like the Democrats much at all.
If you want to have a trophy wife, it's pretty easy to do. Go to a trophy shop, buy a trophy, and present her with it. And then start referring to her as your trophy wife. To me, that sounds demeaning, but Blondie eats it up, so maybe it will work for you.
Sometimes, I have the gumption to write ten posts a day, but I don't want to overwhelm my readers. Always leave 'em hungry for more, the show biz people say. Other times, I go several days without posting, not because I don't have ideas, but because my brain is operating on 3 or 4 cylinders instead of all 8, or it's just too physically demanding to sit up in front of the keyboard. I really want to be blogging about gardening right now - it's prime time - and about defending your family's finances - it's prime time for that, too - and I end up blogging about other stuff, for no good reason. I'm disappointed Life On Mars is ending; but really, shouldn't I be talking about getting your seeds planted so that you can raise the crops you want instead of what's available as starts at the garden shop?
Blondie thinks I should mostly be reviewing local restaurants and tourist traps. I'd like to put together a tourism book for Lancaster; it ought to be a good seller, year after year. If I review restaurants, though, I should be able to talk the restaurants into feeding the two of us for free, and if I build a reputation for restaurant reviews, I should be able to sell advertising to local restaurateurs. If I'm going to be telling people how to defend their family against financial storms, I should be able to demonstrate that I'm able to do it myself, right?
Except that I'm so low on energy that I haven't even been able to build websites for a couple of products I should be selling online. It's not something I can bring in someone else to do, either; it's making decisions that takes the energy, and I have to do that, no matter what.
Be glad you have a job. When you retire and you haven't a job anymore, all your free time goes pffft. What's more, once you retire, you never get coffee breaks, lunch hours, holidays, weekends. I used to get 90% of my stuff done during coffee breaks and lunch hours, and having lost them, I'm in deep doo-doo.
toe towing
Whenever I come across the phrase toe/tow the line, the mental image I get is of one who pulls the rope/line that is attached to the barge full of whatever. I believe in that case that tow would be correct. In either case, I think both phrases correctly try to describe one who does not stray, whether over the line or off the beaten path.
Thanks for the quibble
To me, that doesn't make too much sense.
After all, if you are towing a line from a barge, that would indicate that the line is not straying from the path of the barge; you, on the other hand, are free to take the barge anywhere, albeit with a little more drag than the hull would otherwise present.
Not making sense, of course, doesn't mean it's wrong; government policies often don't make sense. Oops, I guess that's a poor example; government policies are often wrong as well.
There is a nautical connection, however. Two centuries ago, sailors given group punishment were required to stand in formation on deck. It certainly sounds better than receiving a lashing on the order of Mr. Christian aboard the Bounty, but as a kid, I had a sadistic coach who used this as punishment for those who lost foot races. Obviously, someone had to come in last, right? Thinking about it, a million years later, I can still feel the ache in my shins and my calves.
In the Edinburgh Literary Journal of January - June 1831, a writer stated "The matter, therefore, necessarily became rather serious; and the whole gang of us being sent for on the quarter-deck, we were ranged in a line, each with his toes at the edge of a plank, according to the orthodox fashion of these gregarious scoldings, technically called toe-the-line matches."
In prize-fighting, they had toe-to-toe boxing matches in the 19th century. Whether formal or informal, the person serving as referee would mark a line, often by scratching a line in the dirt, and start the match after demanding that the participants toe the line or toe the scratch. This is where the phrases "up to scratch" and "start from scratch" comes from. Start from scratch originally meant "to start with no advantage", as in a scratch golf match, although in recent years, it's mostly taken to mean "to start with no advantage because it's starting from nothing".
(Old joke: customer asks the waitress if the cake is good. The waitress says yes, our cook makes it from scratch. In that case, the customer says, ask the cook to wash his hands, and then make me a sandwich.)
Thanks for the quibble. Our language evolves, and what something means is what people today think it means, so you're not entirely wrong. But the folks at MSNBC make themselves look unreliable when they tolerate illiteracy. Googling on the various news networks, MSNBC seems to have much more of a Chyron problem than Fox News or CNN. Fox News, the "fair and balanced" network gets criticized more for being fairly blatant in deliberate lies, and their concept of balanced reminds me of the old beer ad that said you should always buy two cases, so you don't fall over in the checkout line.
CNBC, owned by the same division of GE as MSNBC, seems to do well on Chryon. In fact, the Chyrons on Mad Money aren't just literate, they often are clever and funny, almost as good as Stephen Colbert's The Word. They folks at C-Span don't get cutesy with their Chyron, but their Chyron operators seem to be good spellers.
Looking competent should help increase viewers, and thus allow more profitable ad sales. GE knows that. That's why they got upset when Jon Stewart skewered CNBC for promoting Jim Cramer as God-like ("In Cramer We Trust") when he's obviously not, judging from his track record. And when Stewart skewered MSNBC with "I like my morning news like I like my coffee, white and bitter", Joe Scarborough ignored the jibe, even after a Morning Joe announcer for the show goaded him a little.
If I were still in the newspaper business, I'd work towards publishing only a Sunday paper (which is profitable because of all the preprints that are inserted) plus a "food day" paper, which is profitable from the supermarket advertising and coupons. For the next year or two, I'd produce a very thin paper on the other days, which basically would have headlines and a couple of paragraphs, and the URL of the rest of the story; people would buy it to have something to read in the restaurant while waiting for their food.
Otherwise, I'd turn myself into a internet television station, updating stories around the clock. The newspaper already has the news crews, already has the advertising sales crews, and has credibility. After all, who are you going to trust for local news, the people who have been in the news business since the 1800s, or the folks who bring you Lost and Dancing With The Stars?
Servers are cheap. Video cameras are cheap. It'd be an easy move. And if you started offering videos of all the local high school games, not just selected highlights from one or two schools, you could blow the local broadcast stations out of the water.